In recent years, passive investing — buying into index funds that track broad markets — has become the default for many investors. Its appeal is clear: low fees, instant diversification, and a simple “set and forget” approach. In stable and growing markets, passive investing has delivered reliable returns by capturing the overall upward trajectory of global equities.

But the current macro landscape is anything but straightforward. The United States is grappling with what many are calling a debt blackhole, with government debt now exceeding 100% of GDP and climbing. Servicing this debt requires higher issuance of Treasury bonds, which, combined with elevated interest rates, puts pressure on financial markets. At the same time, inflationary forces, shifting geopolitics, and uncertain global growth are making markets far more volatile than the smooth, decade-long bull run of the 2010s.

‍

This environment raises an important question: is a purely passive approach still the best way forward?

‍

‍Why Passive Investing Still Matters

Passive strategies do have advantages:

• Low cost – minimal fees leave more money invested.
• ‍Broad diversification –exposure to hundreds or thousands of companies across sectors.
• Simplicity – “set and forget” approach.
• Long-term participation –passive investors capture overall market growth over time.

These benefits make passive investing a useful foundation, particularly for long-term, cost-conscious investors.

‍

‍The Limitations of Passive Investing

• No downside protection –returns rise and fall with the market, with no flexibility.
• Exposure to weak sectors –you own the strong alongside the struggling.
• Sector concentration risk –many indexes are heavily weighted to a few sectors.
• Blind to valuation –paying the market price regardless of fundamentals.
• No flexibility in changing markets –cannot adapt to macroeconomic shifts.
• Limited opportunity for outperformance –you only earn the market return minus fees.

‍

‍Why We Prefer Active Investing in Current Times

Active investing — championed by Warren Buffett — focuses on selective, strategic exposure. It allows us to focus on sectors with strong fundamentals, growth potential, and resilience, while avoiding those more vulnerable in uncertain times.

Key advantages include:

• Selective exposure –allows the focus on sectors, for example, healthcare, infrastructure, or essential services.
• Risk management –adapt portfolios to reduce exposure to weaker sectors.
• Opportunity in volatility –take advantage of temporary mispricing in sectors.
• Adaptability – respond dynamically to changing macroconditions such as debt, interest rates, and global uncertainty.

‍

Limitations of Active Investing

Of course, active strategies aren’t without challenges:

• Higher costs –more research and management can mean higher fees.
• Execution risk – results depend on the skill and discipline of the manager.
• Short-term temptation –reacting too quickly to market noise can hurt long-term outcomes.
• Patience required –it may take time to see results, especially in volatile markets.

‍

What This Means for You

‍

✅ Takeaway: Passive investing is a strong foundation, but today’s markets call for active management to stay flexible, resilient, and positioned to seize opportunity.

Markets may be unpredictable, but a thoughtful, active approach, combined with a passive approach where applicable, can help your portfolio not just survive —but thrive — in uncertain times.

As always, we’re here to guide you, answer questions, and ensure your investments align with your goals and values. Please contact your adviser if you have any questions on this approach or to discuss your current investments.